Is He… You Know,,, A Correspondent Of Jonah Magnus?

we are in a media literacy crisis

in a hundred wonderful ways.

Had an idea

there is this fascinating thing that comes out in some branches of tma discourse that reveals a kind of fucky mindset that a lot of people have, and it's the idea that if an action is justified then all of its negative outcomes can be written off as negligible, or the vice versa, that if something had negative outcomes then it couldn't have been justified. I see this a lot in georgie discourse, where people can't seem to hold at once in their heads that it is completely within a person's rights to cut off a friend for the sake of their own safety and it can (and most likely will) really suck for that friend and make them feel done wrong by and abandoned while leaving them worse off with less support. the core weirdness of that awful melanie take was the idea that she didn't have the right to be traumatized or feel upset at jon for the bullet surgery because there was no other way, which is a take so antithetical to everything tma tries to express and to, like, the everyday realities of real life that it genuinely boggles my mind. really How do you end up thinking like that. I want to know.

from that goofy spiderverse gif going around I present MAG 179

every time someone calls jude a terf or elias a tory a fairy dies somewhere

for tma prompts: elias holding up the rib jon got to keep to where it used to be, perhaps...?

more ribs !!! joyous !!!! altho to be Honest idk what i was going for here but by the end i just wanted the doodle to not look empty 😔

ℂ𝔼𝔸𝕊𝔼𝕃𝔼𝕊𝕊 𝕎𝔸𝕋ℂℍ𝔼ℝ, 𝕋𝕌ℝℕ 𝕐𝕆𝕌ℝ 𝔾𝔸ℤ𝔼 𝕌ℙ𝕆ℕ 𝕋ℍ𝕀𝕊 𝕎ℝ𝔼𝕋ℂℍ𝔼𝔻 𝕋ℍ𝕀ℕ𝔾.

Keep reading

I cannot wait to match his freak