Robert Downey Jr.’s Eyes Reblog If You Agree

Reblog or your mom will die in 928 seconds.

I love my mom.

I am risking nothing

I AM SORRY FOLLOWERS, I LOVE MY MOMMY

Will not risk.

sorry followers :(

I need more people to follow so like or reblog this if you post any of the things listed below and I’ll check out your blog.

sherlock

history facts/ pictures/…

chopin

classic music in general

ravenclaw/ slytherclaw stuff

intj stuff

minimalistic and pleasing posts

psychology

greek art

literature

star trek

mysterious/ supernatural/ horror stories, facts or unsolved murder

japanese study pages

biology study pages

psychology study pages

old movies ( i prefer b&w movies )

Nigeria 

ig:  @jidenna

quarantine day 924

So I arrived at my MIT dorm today and was assigned a room for this week. THERE IS A RAINBOW PAINTED SMACK DAB OUTSIDE MY DOOR. I SHIT YOU NOT, A GIANT, FLOOR TO CEILING RAINBOW. If this ain’t a sign…

Happy Birthday Martin Freeman

(September 8, 1971)

cbsnews.com

Supreme Court rules to protect police from lawsuits over violating Miranda rights

The conservative majority said officers are immune to civil lawsuits over Miranda violations because the warnings are not constitutional rig

Law enforcement officers who fail to provide criminal suspects with Miranda warnings prior to questioning cannot be subjected to civil lawsuits for their omissions, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Thursday.

Justices determined by a 6-3 vote that receiving Miranda warnings — which notify individuals taken into custody of their rights to remain silent, speak with an attorney and ask for that attorney to be present during interactions with police — is not technically a protected constitutional right. 

The court's classification means that individuals deprived of their Miranda warnings before criminal interrogations take place will not have a foundation to bring legal claims that allege their civil rights were violated after the fact. It effectively protects police officers against civil litigation while also limiting individual protections against self-incrimination.

"A violation of Miranda does not necessarily constitute a violation of the Constitution," wrote Justice Samuel Alito in an opinion reflecting the court's conservative majority. In light of that, Alito said such a violation could not "authorize a civil rights suit against a police officer."

Bruce: Tony we need Ste-

Tony, actively yeeting himself 27464849595 miles away from earth: this isn’t sad at all FRIDAY play We Don’t Talk Anymore