Dive Deep into Creativity: Discover, Share, Inspire
Has there ever been an anti-anti pope (not the pope, not an anti pope but a secret third thing)
You mean the Pisan popes?
So we had the pope in Rome and the antipope in Avignon. This whole thing was called the Western Schism.
There was a council and a conclave, with cardinals from both sides that attended a council and appointed a THIRD pope in Pisa in the hopes that it would end the Western Schism (spoiler alert, it did not).
See it was kind of difficult to determine if it was valid because only one cardinal that attended was appointed BEFORE the schism. The others had all been appointed by either the popes or the antipopes and so they were evidently biased.
They did try to agree to abdicate at the same time at one point but then they both went back on it...
There was also discussion about wether they could even call for a council because the pope is the one who is supposed to do that. So both Pisan popes are largely considered as antipopes and the roman line is considered the 'true' line of popes.
So eventually the Roman pope agreed to resign, the Pisan pope was removed. The Avignon pope was not co-operating so he was excommunicated and a whole new pope was elected.
The Avignon popes kind of kept going for a little bit longer but eventually the next Avignon pope resigned too and recognised the Roman pope as the true pope